PRINCESS DIANA'S -- UNANSWERED QUESTION --- 18 August, 2013

PRINCESS DIANA AND DODI

UPDATE:  18 August 2013  -  
A news report on BBC revealed that the Metropolitan Police received and assessing new information about the Princess Diana's and Dodi Al Fayad's death. The last enquiry resulted into a verdict "accidental death" blaming mainly the driver. However, rumours became louder and louder that Paul Henry was not drunk as claimed before. Apparently the blood sample was mixed up. Let's hope now the truth will be told. It is high time after 16 years.


It has been too many years after Princess Diana's death and still too many questions hadn't been answered.

1) Why wasn't there straight away a proper investigation?

2) Driver Paul Henry's blood contains carbon monoxide which points to a suicide and yet they won't give the names of the other dead people in the mortuary?

This question was partly answered in the last inquest the blood samples which supposed to be the driver’s was admitted that it wasn’t.

3) With that alcohol content it was proven that you couldn't even stand?

4) The driver of the white Fiat Uno was never found?

5) A black car was in front and one black car at the back plus a motorcycle. It is known that they were not paparazzi?

6) CCTV s were not working at the time of the accident. A woman driver was given a speeding ticket shortly or after, I am not sure whether if was before or after?

7) The Mercedes was not given to Mercedes-Benz in Stuttgart for their experts to examine it?

8) With Diana very seriously injured, why did not they stop at the first hospital?

9) Then they drove almost at a standstill speed to the next hospital?

10) A doctor who was driving there at the time of the accident stated she could have been saved and why wasn't he allowed to attend to Diana? Also why wasn’t he allowed to attend the inquest to testify?

11) Why were documents called 'the jewel of the crown' taken and vanished?

12) Why wasn't the letter where Diana states that she had a suspicion to be killed to make way for her husband to be able to marry again, her lawyer gave it to the police, not given to the French police or at least tell them that they hold such a letter of that nature?

13) Why wasn't the where-about of Paul Henri investigated there and then and I am sure it could have been found out?

14) Why wasn't the flag flown at half mast straightaway? I let go of the question that the Queen didn't come back to London and wanted to stay with the Princesses to comfort them. However, she should have given the order to fly the flag half-mast.

I feel very sorry for Paul Henri's parents for having lost their son and accused of causing the crash. My heart goes out to Mr Al Fayed having lost his eldest son and has to fight for the truth but will it ever be revealed?  You can see how much he grieves. He aged so much.

All these questions remained unanswered and are not dealt with. They weren't even touch in the inquiry. At least this time they had a verdict of 'Unlawful Killing'. Do people look that stupid to the authorities or the Royal family that they think you could just leave these very important questions unanswered? It must be. Furthermore, what does “Unlawful Killing” suppose to mean? Doesn’t it mean murder?

One journalist, and he is one of the best, stated that he heard from a very reliable source that the whole household almost had a relieved atmosphere after the news broke.

No, I think that the people aren't anymore that easily convinced and they want and deserve a proper investigation and I mean a proper investigation to get answers to all these questions whatever the truth is. Princess Diana deserves that after all she done for the people and had been put through and so do her sons.Top of Form

Bottom of Form