NEW CLAIMS ABOUT PRINCESS DIANA'S DEATH - updated 24 August 2013

UPDATE:  24 August 2013 --  It has now been confirmed that the elite special forces officer named only as Soldier N is an credible witness. A further revelation by Mr Morgan the author of several books about the death of Princess Diana, Dodi and the driver Henri Paul stated that the  British authority had known of this for two years. The letter written by the soldiers N mother-in-law was sent in September 2011. Mr Morgan goes a step further and assumed that the assassin was one of the motorbike riders following the car she was travelling in. One day we will all know the truth.

Scotland Yard detectives received a seven page letter forward the SAS claiming the SAS was involved in the death of Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul. The parents-in-law of a SAS soldier who is only named by N they stated information in a letter which will now be assessed by officers of the Special Crime and Operation commands at Scotland Yard. 

This letter was sent to his elite unit commanding officer and it was forwarded to Scotland Yard.

Princess Diana, Dodi and Henri Paul died when the Mercedes smashed into the wall of a Paris underpass when they tried to get away from the press. In an inquest in 2008 the verdict was “accidental death” and the driver Henri Paul was blamed to have been drunk. In the meantime it was prove wrong.  The father of Dodi always claimed they had been murdered. The German car manufacturer Mercedes Benz asked for the car to be examined by their special engineers but it was refused.  A mysterious white Fiat was never found.

Princess Diana’s Ambulance drove so slowly it was almost at a standstill and then she was pronounced dead at arrival. Documents which she called the jewel in the crown were never found.

There are too many controversies.

Scotland Yard confirmed it was assessing the “relevance and credibility”.

On 31 August it will be the 16^th anniversary and most of the public still belief there were too many cover ups for the full truth told. Already the fact that Henri Paul supposed to be have drunk was prove that there was a switch or mix-up of the blood sample because there was dioxide in the blood which only can come from the exhaust.  What goes against Henri Paul that he went missing for two hours and it was never revealed where he went.  Also cars had been changed in the last minute.  Although many details sound mysterious but it is not always necessarily to be the cause.

A very interesting comment from one of the readers pointed to a book written by Ranulaph Fiennes ‘the feather men’. He was a top officer s in the SAS. He wrote about the various method of killing a person. One was to attached an electronic device to the control of the required vehicle, then to a remote control and direct the car to a concrete bollard. The result is instant death in 95 per cent cases.  

Could that have been it? It sounds too familiar.