Thursday, 12 September 2013

PRINCESS DIANA, DODI AND HENRY PAUL VICTIMS OF A PLOT?



IT IS INCREDIBLE, 

LOOKING AT THE 
WRECK, 
THAT ANYBODY 
GOT OUT OF IT ALIVE
Since the letter from one of the SAS soldiers’ mother-in-law was sent to his officer revealing that her son-in-law was speaking several times of the SAS being involved in the ‘accident’ which killed Princess Diana there had been several inquiries into the allegation.

So far it emerged that most of the SAS troops are convinced Diana was murdered but deny the SAS had anything to do with it. However, the SAS soldiers are highly trained and knowledgeable about various actions admit there are too many unanswered questions.

A source said:  “When you are planning a military operation you have to train and practise. For that to be passed off as an accident just doesn’t ring true.”

Scotland Yard is assessing sensational claims that the SAS was involved in the deaths.

Two detectives went to interview the ex-wife of the Soldier only named by N and apparently she gave the police “detailed and compelling “details of the claims allegedly made by her husband. She also convinced the police officers that the former SAS sniper told her several time before their marriage broke up.

Soldier N claimed Mr Paul was blinded by an intense flash of light just before he lost control of the Mercedes.  This fact was also given by ex-MI6 officer as evidence at the inquest into Diana’s and Dodi’s death. The same man also revealed the knowledge of a shadowy unit named ‘The Increment’ which included soldiers from the SAS and SBS.

Their job is to carry out lethal operation on behalf of MI6.

The letter and allegation were sent in 2011 but since Soldier N and Danny Nightingale were caught to possess firearms at home and both court marshalled with a prison sentence the whole scenario was only made public now.   Soldiers N was released in July 2013 and discharged from the Army. The top Brass ordered the regiment to cut all ties with him. However, friends admitted that he would hardly be ostracised since there is a great sympathy for him. After all he gave the country 20 years of his service in the most dangerous spots of the world.

Furthermore, accordingly many soldiers have kept illegal guns and ammunition at their home which is not secured for that quality of weapons. In the wake of Soldier N and Danny Nightingale an amnesty was sanctioned regarding such unlawfully, kept weapons which resulted into skipfuls of guns and ammo. 

Therefore those two men should not have been picked out, court marshalled and losing their job including pension.

However, after all that we are still left with too many unanswered questions.

1)      Witnesses described a blinding flash shortly before the Mercedes crashed into the wall.

2)       Did that flash come from the paparazzi or an assassin using an intense beam to blind the driver?

3)      Who were the two riders on powerful black motorcycles which some witnesses claim it causes the crash?

4)      A billion passenger who jumped off to peer at the wreckage and made a sign to his associate. Did it mean “mission accomplished” or has this witness misunderstood?

5)      The driver of the mysterious white Fiat Uno colluded with the riders of the black motorbike as it roared into the tunnel after the Mercedes, was never found. The Fiat clipped the Mercedes allowing the two motorbikes to get into position in front.

6)      The allegedly completely drunk Paul Henri was proved that the blood samples must been switched since there was dioxide in it.

7)      Why did they take four long hours to get Diana to an Emergency Hospital? She died of internal bleeding. Even the famous heart surgeon Dr Christian Barnard stated that she could have been saved. A doctor at the crash scene also stated that she could have been saved.

8)      Why was Diana’s body embalmed? No one in the Western world gets embalmed any more today.  It is assumed that she was pregnant with Dodi’s child and this was the only way to prevent the evidence to be known.


9)      Why was Mercedes Benz’s engineers not given the right to inspect the vehicle?

No comments:

Post a Comment