IPCC ADMITS FAKED GLOBAL WARMING -

SNOW STORM IN LINCOLNSHIRE

The IPCC was not closed down after admitting Global Warming was fake but they are back in the news again still insisting the world is still warming up. 

There is no doubt we are heading for a Global Warming and have to cut down on pollution. However, thats how the awareness all began.

Apparently Rajandra Pachauri is back again on the panel and is now a Professor. The last time Rajandra Pachauri went to India after the publication of falsified statistics. Is there another commercial adventure involved for bringing back Global Warming, as there usually is? The last time we heard about it wind farms were springing up everywhere which were now claimed as a scam by a MP.  

If you read the whole article you will be amazed that the IPCC is coming back again with the same so-called 'evidence'.

UPDATE:  13 January 2013 – Yet it is amazing that the IPCC is still in existence and using taxpayers’ money at a time of austerity. Any private company issuing false data would be closed down and find heavily. So why was not the IPCC closed down?

The head of IPCC Rajandra Pachauri was a Railway engineer. How did he qualify for this top post and received money to which he had no right to? He was never challenged to return it.  W H Y?

At last they admitted it that they got it wrong. The world's leading climate change body IPCC had been forced to owe up to it they got the figures of the global warming wrong. It was officially stated by a senior member of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel.

The statement that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035 was based on 'speculation' and not on facts. The panel's vice chairman Dr Jean-Pascal van Ypersele stated that a review would be launched.

There were doubts that the global warming was man-made and not a natural cycle.  In November a leaked email from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit stated that scientists were changing the figures to show that the climate change was a cause by humans.

The scandal raised the suspicion that scientists' interests are to secure more funding for research. The head of IPCC, Rajandra Pachauri, used the claims to get a fund of taxpayer-funded grants of hundreds of thousands of Dollars. The IPCC was set by the UN to make sure that world leaders had the possible scientific advice on climate change. It produced a report stated it was based on the latest research.

Scientists and glaciologists disputed this statement and even went that far to suggest the IPCC misread an earlier study.  In that study it is assumed the disappearance could be 2350. It was discovered that the Indian scientist Syed Hasnain made this statement in an interview in 1999 with New Scientist magazine.

IPCC also used the global warming it justify the natural disasters and moved it into political and public debates. In Copenhagen it was one of the topics in the climate summit. This brought a demand from the third world of 62billion compensation reasoning that the developed world brought this about.

The statement was never investigated by the World Wildlife Fund and IPCC copied it in its 2007 assessment. Apparently, a scientist warned the figure was wrong before it was published.

In 2006 a paper was written by a disaster impact expert. The IPCC published this report in 2008 without being scientifically scrutinised. Afterwards a warning was given that there is insufficient evidence in the claim. Yet the IPCC did not clarify it before the Copenhagen summit.

It was discovered that the former railway engineer Dr Pachauri, also a chairman of The Energy and Resources Institute in New Delhi, received the biggest part of a 2.5million EU research grant. This means taxpayers funding research into glaciers were established as a bogus.

Dr Pachauri under all this pressure had to admit that there was no evidence to support his claim and yet he applied for a grant for his institute. One application got him a grant of £310,000 from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Dr Pachauri defying calls for his resignation and denies wrong-doing, started slowly to admit that if the global warming exists at all it will take centuries.

The other grant of £2.5million was for a research of the effect on India if the glaciers have melted. It was EU's top project and was launched. The EU grant given to various research institutions, Britain’s Met Office and The Energy and Resources Institute which received the major but unspecified share.

Mr George Kaser of the University of Innsbruck in Austria said that all these statements about global warming are so wrong that it is not even worth to discuss them. That is a clever way to get out of the situation.