The real reason is to stop Russia bombing the 'rebels' but at the same time the US escalates the conflict and the Russians are forced to counteract. Again the US invades Syria illegal like Iraq and Afghanistan.
Back to the
same old situation, played for decades, US and its Western Allies confront
Russia.
For four years the US and the West played with fire interfering in Syria
by supporting the “rebels” to bring Assad’s regime down. Why? It is anyone’s guess. Since 2014 they are
flying air strikes to ‘destroy’ the IS because they getting out of hand b but Russia claims the US only pretended to some extend.. The US blame the Russians for destroying also "rebels" positions which are supported by the US
The very ruthless
IS sprung out of Al-Qaeda which is supported by the US. Even al-Qaeda is now turning against IS
because their leader declared that they are the true Muslims.
Since the IS
and other rebels’ group seem to be spreading, Russia, which supports Mr Assad
regime saw no alternative but to intervene by military after the UN Security
Council resolution failed.
Russia
started to fly air strikes and claims to have destroyed eight IS strongholds
near populated areas in the Homs province and hit 11 training comps affiliated
with jihadi groups in the Hama and Raqqa province.
As a result
on the strikes the infrastructure used for the training of terrorists has been
destroyed. What is wrong with that, except that it might US-run training camps?
Now the US
Defence stated: “Russia will pay the price for Syria’s air
strikes.” What is hard to understand and
accept is that America is flying air strikes, and that was all right by the
governments, not by the people wanting peace, but the moment Russia flies air
strikes it is condemnable. These people playing a hypocritical game but too dangerous
since they threaten Russia now.
Why the West
is following the US is hard to tell but the whole situation seems to be
mounting up to a very dangerous point which threatens an outbreak of war. Mr
Assad has now been called a dictator but this strategy is nothing new since
other Middle East countries’ leaders were called the same and they were brought
down. The result of those actions was
and is devastating for the countries.
Ashton Carter
predicted that Russia will soon paying the price for their military campaign to
back-up Assad’s regime. Whatever Mr
Assad may be it is hard to figure out with all the propaganda but how will Americans
feel if some force would invade their country and try to topple their
President?
Now Saudi Arabia
and the Gulf allies are starting to rattle their swords.
America was
the first to interfere without any obvious reasons but as Mr Assad said in an
interview at the BBC the US like to have their chosen leaders to be a glove puppets.
It should be
the US and Western allies withdrawing from Syria to prevent a total war
breaking out. Another total war is not worth to get Mr Assad out, is it?
Jens
Stollenberg, NATO secretary general, said: “We don’t have to deploy the Nato
response force or the spearhead force to deliver deterrence. The important
thing is that any adversary of Nato will know that we are able to deploy.”
Mr Assad,
was said by a diplomat, to be prepared to step up its support having despaired
on the US from Qatar and Turkey. The Saudis will hold talks about their next
step.
Saudi Arabia
insists Mr Assad must go. The plan is to add further aid to the rebel groups
and with weapons via the border of Turkey. This move is also questionable since
Turkey got involved with flying air strikes. Are these air strike against IS or
Assad’ regime?
Russia
defence ministry announced that more air-strikes will be carried out. The crews of SUKO Su-34, SUKHOI Su24M and SUKHOI
Su-25 struck 27 on Syria’s territory target.
No comments:
Post a Comment