MAY FACES ENDLESS TROUBLES

Whenever May is in Brussels she announces, with a great smile, that she achieved another victory for Brexit. Unfortunately, so far, it turns out to be false.

At first, she makes us believe she makes the EU change its mind over the demand of £60bn divorce bill and several other points. When May refused and the EU stopped negotiation.

When she returned May announced she would pay £39bn, officially, but with so many lies it is not knowing what she really promised to pay. However, the EU started to open its doors again for further talks.

After further talks, May, again gleefully announced that she achieved to start trade negotiation and Brexit is well on its way. She also received an applause after her speech at a dinner in Brussels. It does make you more suspicious of what really went on.

It didn’t take a day that the truth came through. EU slammed on its brakes and showed its full power.

1 - They blocked further trade talks till March 2018

2 - They ban any trade deals with the rest of the world till 2021

Concluding, UK will be in the EU till 2021 and no promise of it being the final. It came after May was willing to pay £39bn, officially. Does it also mean that UK will have to pay their membership of £19bn each year plus all sorts of other fees, like paying for other countries which have not got their fees? In view of the two years extra, the EU would have their £60bn as demanded; a very clever move. The EU certainly knows how to make sure the money keeps rolling in.

It is known that the EU is the most corrupt organisation. Many years ago, the scandal broke that over £95tn are unaccounted for and the auditors refused to sign their account, tells everything. The EU supposed to be going bankrupt, despite of billions rolling in.

It is very doubtful that MPs, especial a group of Tory’s rebels will accept these new outcomes. There will be a vote on Wednesday, 17 Dec., 2017 in the House of Commons. Therefore, May could face another defeat.

The other problem May has, is to face the US and Saudi Arabia confrontation.

US president Donald Trump announced to make Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and planning to move his embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. It was the most unwise decision any leader could have made in view of the constant Israeli domineering and tormenting Palestinian people pushing them to extinction and possessing the whole land.

There was an immediate uproar and protest from Palestine and its people and hundred died already being shot dead by Israeli soldiers. Well done, clever Trump. Anyone could have foreseen that.

The tension also was increased by Saudi Arabia. They disagreed with the decision and announced to support Palestine. In other words, confronting Trump and the US, if necessary. It will also have an impact on the mighty Israelis.

Even the UN announced a resolution against Jerusalem becoming the capital of Israel. It will be interesting to see the reaction of Israel now.

But the most interesting point will be how May will deal with the situation. US and Saudi Arabia are her biggest Allies and weapon buyer.

Whichever side she moves to the other party will be lost and most probably turn hostile towards the UK.

Or will she play ostrich and trying to put her head into the sand, hopefully it will blow over again but with such an important confrontation it is hard to belief it will have an impact in future no matter how much she is trying to be diplomatic and keep out of it.

It also raises the question, will she and the Tories be able to cope with two such major issues or will they have to resign, which all people hope and Labour comes into power?

Well, as the saying goes “Time will tell”.

USA THREATENS RUSSIA OVER SYRIA- Update: 31 October, 2015

UPDATE 31 Oct., 2015 --  Now the USA can sit down with the Russians in Moscow  to work out a deal.  Why not earlier? But apparently it did not influence the US to stop. They are planning to put troops on the ground of Syria without permission of the Syrian Government. 

The real reason is to stop Russia bombing the 'rebels' but at the same time the US escalates the conflict and the Russians are forced to counteract. Again the US invades Syria illegal like Iraq and Afghanistan.                                                                                                                  

Back to the same old situation, played for decades, US and its Western Allies confront Russia.

 For four years the US and the West played with fire interfering in Syria by supporting the “rebels” to bring Assad’s regime down.  Why? It is anyone’s guess. Since 2014 they are flying air strikes to ‘destroy’ the IS because they getting out of hand b but Russia claims the US only pretended to some extend.. The US blame the Russians for destroying also "rebels" positions which are supported by the US

The very ruthless IS sprung out of Al-Qaeda which is supported by the US.  Even al-Qaeda is now turning against IS because their leader declared that they are the true Muslims.

Since the IS and other rebels’ group seem to be spreading, Russia, which supports Mr Assad regime saw no alternative but to intervene by military after the UN Security Council resolution failed.

Russia started to fly air strikes and claims to have destroyed eight IS strongholds near populated areas in the Homs province and hit 11 training comps affiliated with jihadi groups in the Hama and Raqqa province.

As a result on the strikes the infrastructure used for the training of terrorists has been destroyed. What is wrong with that, except that it might US-run training camps?

Now the US Defence stated: “Russia will pay the price for Syria’s air strikes.”  What is hard to understand and accept is that America is flying air strikes, and that was all right by the governments, not by the people wanting peace, but the moment Russia flies air strikes it is condemnable. These people playing a hypocritical game but too dangerous since they threaten Russia now.

Why the West is following the US is hard to tell but the whole situation seems to be mounting up to a very dangerous point which threatens an outbreak of war. Mr Assad has now been called a dictator but this strategy is nothing new since other Middle East countries’ leaders were called the same and they were brought down.  The result of those actions was and is devastating for the countries.

Ashton Carter predicted that Russia will soon paying the price for their military campaign to back-up Assad’s regime.  Whatever Mr Assad may be it is hard to figure out with all the propaganda but how will Americans feel if some force would invade their country and try to topple their President?

Now Saudi Arabia and the Gulf allies are starting to rattle their swords.

America was the first to interfere without any obvious reasons but as Mr Assad said in an interview at the BBC the US like to have their chosen leaders to be a  glove puppets.

It should be the US and Western allies withdrawing from Syria to prevent a total war breaking out. Another total war is not worth to get Mr Assad out, is it?

Jens Stollenberg, NATO secretary general, said: “We don’t have to deploy the Nato response force or the spearhead force to deliver deterrence. The important thing is that any adversary of Nato will know that we are able to deploy.”

Mr Assad, was said by a diplomat, to be prepared to step up its support having despaired on the US from Qatar and Turkey. The Saudis will hold talks about their next step.

Saudi Arabia insists Mr Assad must go. The plan is to add further aid to the rebel groups and with weapons via the border of Turkey. This move is also questionable since Turkey got involved with flying air strikes. Are these air strike against IS or Assad’ regime?

Russia defence ministry announced that more air-strikes will be carried out.  The crews of SUKO Su-34, SUKHOI Su24M and SUKHOI Su-25 struck 27 on Syria’s territory target.

BOMBING OF KUNDUZ HOSPITAL AFGHANISTAN - Updated 3 Nov., 2016

UPDATE 3 November, 2016 --

In the meantime there were three hospitals bombed in Syria and a UN Aid Convoy which till today there was no investigation or explanation of whose done it. 

If it was Russia it would have been headlined in every newspaper.

UPDATE:  6 October, 2015 -

US Commander of Internal Forces in Afghanistan Gen Campbell said that  the bombing of the hospital was a mistake. He added further that the US would never bomb a medical facility.

This is unacceptable  because explanation was that there 12- 15 Taliban hiding in there. The MSF (doctors without borders) kept also calling the military authority emphasising that there is a hospital; when the bombing started. 

This time the US has to stand up and admit that they did not bomb the hospital by mistake but where trying to kill the Taliban who were hiding in the hopital. They cannot put a statement out like that insulting the dead.


It is high time that the US and Western world steps down from their pedestal of “Righteousness”. The US played the powerful for too long  in too many countries and every time turned the country into a worst state.

To bomb a hospital, for no matter what reason is beyond any justification.  Only yesterday the US condemned Russia of not bombing the right targets in their eyes. Today we receive the news that a hospital, run by doctors without borders was bomb.

In spite of the atrocity, UK PM David Cameron condemned Russia for bombing Syria, today. Not one word about condemning US bombing an hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan. 

Now they are justifying it by claiming that 12 or 15 Taliban were hiding in the hospital. Even if it was true it should have been dealt by ground force. It also proves that they knew where the hospital was. Bombing a hospital will never win the people over.  This action has created even more hatred towards the US and the West.

This action is absolutely and totally condemnable in ever way.

Even an excuse of not knowing where the hospital is or hitting it by accident will not wash. The medical staff informed the military authority again when the general bombing started.

This time US and NATO have to accept the full responsibility of an absolute atrocity and creating more enemies. Of course, America is far from any retaliation on the street but Europe will be in the frontline or be more precise its people.  The heads that are responsible of ordering such an attack are never retaliated or pulled into court for was crimes.

Bush and Blair are still living a life of luxury despite started an illegal war which cost thousands of lives and even more injuries some with life destroying affects. They should in court for was crime for a long time.

CRIMEA   The people voted to be annexed to Russia but the Western Powers and US did not like it and started sanctioning Russia even so it hurt their own economy which is not great. Then a revolt in Ukraine broke out and the new president is on the western side. This created pro-Russian insurgents and Russia got involved. But was not the US in the first place causing the trouble?

SYRIA The US was supporting and still is the so called "Freedom Fighters" which were infiltrated by al-Qaeda. From al-Qaeda sprang a most military and radical group IS. The intelligence of US West must have been aware of it from the start. The public only became fully aware when IS started to behead their captives who were as early as 2012. It all came to a breakout of war when a chemical bomb was dropped on the outskirts of Damascus. John Kerry US Secretary of State, was beating the drums for the West to join into a military intervention.  David Cameron agreed but the MPs voted against it. In the last minute Russia intervened by requesting President Mr Assad to hand over his stockpile of chemical weapons which were destroyed.

Despite a UN delegation of specialists moving in to discover who was responsible; the report was never published. It makes it very suspicious that it was not Assad regime as it was claimed and John Kerry never spoke of it again.

The US could not have left it at that but started bombing as they claim to destroy the IS. Russia now claims they only pretended. Maybe it is or not is hard to tell because the propaganda machine is working in full swing. US has then brought in the West, including UK despite the MPs voted against it. All the time US demanded that the fly-over exclusion zone in the North should be  opened. The territory where Assad's regime is located.

Russia decided, after no resolution was found at the last UN Security Council meeting, it had to move in, military, to back up Mr Assad whose allied they are. When they started bombing to destroy the opposition America was up in arms. According to the Russian's report they bombed armoury depots, communications facilities and fuel supplies. 

At the moment the two powers are standing facing each other. Will it built up to another war? All the signs are there because there are many big nations behind each of them who will have to come in as it was in the last two World Wars. Let's hope they see the sense of the madness and back off.

RUSSIA STARTED AIR STRIKES IN SYRIA-- UPDATE 1 Oct., 2015

UPDATE: 1 October, 2015 --
US is willing to talk to Russians as soon as possible to avoid clashes of their air strikes.

Why could it not be done at the UN meeting only a few days ago?  

Their aim is to hit rebel-controlled areas as of Homs and Hama provinces in Syria. Russia informed the US one hours before the military operation began.

An US defence official said: “A Russian official in Baghdad this morning informed US embassy personnel that Russian military aircrafts begin flying anti-Isil mission today over Syria. He further requests that US aircraft avoid Syrian airspace during these missions.”

This action seems to be the result that Russia does not think there will be a diplomatic resolution, either from the UN Security Council or the Western allies.

Russia reported that SUKHOI-Su-24 warplanes were involved and operated out of an airbase near Latakia.

It is not quite clear what Russia targeted. According to US official they are not striking any IS-territory. However, the information should not be treated as gospel truth because it could be propaganda. The Russian statement is their planes to support Syria government forces and is striking against the multiple enemies of the Assad’s regime. They revealed further that the air force had targeted IS military equipment, 

communication facilities, arms depots, ammunition and fuel supplies.

If that is the case it is a serious escalation of the conflict and a result of the US State Secretary John Kerry.

The multiple enemies, as quoted by the Russian, are US, UK and West’s Arab or Turkey.

According to the BBC, the Russian’s upper house of their parliament granted President Putin permission to deploy the Russian air force in Syria.

The Syrian opposition reported that the Russian planes bombed Zafaraneh, Rastan, Talbiseh, Makarmia and Ghanto. So far 36 people were killed including children. They emphasized that none of the areas have been control by the IS.

Mr Putin said in a TV interview: “The air strikes were targeting at Islamic militants and Russian citizens – who were taken over large parts of Syria and Iraq.

He added further: “If they (militants) succeed in Syria, they will return to their home country, and they will come to Russia, too.” Mr Putin emphasizes “Russia will not send ground troops to Syria, and that its role in Syria’s army operation will be limited. We certainly are not to plunge head-on into this conflict. We will support the Syrian army purely in a legitimate fight with terrorist groups.”

The net seems to be closing just like before the First World Was and the Second when it started one country and another and another got involved.

Surely, the big powers US, UK, France and Russia could solve the problem round the negotiating table. As the saying goes “Where there is a will, there is a way.”

Russia saved the world last year, in the last minute, from a total war and most probably from a chemical war.  The US and UK could have left it at that but no they had to start air strikes. The IS would have been defeated within the Middle East countries. The West would not have to be involved. Now they pushed it again to the limit and Russia saw no other way but to support Assad’s regime by military actions.

At the moment there are Iran, Russia, Lebanon’s Hezbollah supporting Alawite-led government, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar opposing US, UK and France.  Israel flying air strikes. Details are not known.

There are far too many involved already and threaten the world peace.

Since PM David Cameron is so eager to play the knight in shining armour does he not realise this is not Afghanistan or Iraq or the Falklands?  There are far too many big armies backing Syria’s arm. It is not good to listen to the US because they will far away from the shot.  They can happily light the fuse but when it comes to the big bang it is us who sit in the firing line again.

The US always roping in the UK but where was the US when the IRA kept murdering people in the UK? They even supported the IRA financially. Harold Wilson, Labour, was the only Prime Minister who said no to the US getting involve in the Vietnam war.

David Cameron even went ahead with air strikes in spite of the majority of MPs voted against it.

RUSSIA INCREASES MILITARY BACK-UP IN SYRIA

In my opinion it took longer than expected. The US and the UK played too long cat-and-mouse in this and other countries which were no concern of theirs.

As far back as the destruction of the World Centre; Bush and Blair invaded illegally Afghanistan and fought the Taliban. As before they supported them and when Russia, fighting the Taliban, pulled out because they could not see any winning the fight; America changed their sites and attacked the Taliban. It took 10 years and hundred thousand of civilian lives as well as soldiers.

Now, they are pulling out and it was already reported that the Taliban retook some areas which were bitterly fought over and cleared.

At the same time the US and UK invaded illegally Iraq. Big outcry went across the world that Saddam Hussein was a dictator and has weapon-of-mass-destruction. War raged and people died and they brought down Saddam Hussein and his ruling party.

As before, it was reported, that there were no ISIS in Iraq but now it had a stronghold and the people are far worse off.  The WMD had never been found and British top scientists and weapon expert Dr Kelly lost his live, assumed murdered but classed as suicide. Because he stated that there are no WMD.

The US then supported the rebels in Syria fighting President Bashar Assad.  Eventually it turned out that they turned into a terrorist group Al Qaeda which partly turned into IS.

In 2012 IS started to kidnap journalists and aid workers which was kept from the public for a long time. Eventually, the news broke when IS started to behead them one by one and showed videos of it. They were US and UK people. Then it was discovered that they were held since 2012 and 2013.  Although both governments were aware of it the US still supplied ‘rebels’ with missiles and  the UK chemicals which can be used to produce chemical weapon.

The whole scenario came to a head when a chemical weapon was dropped on Ghouta a suburb of Damascus, in Syria. Mr Assad was accused of using chemical weapons which he denied. The US Secretary of State John Kerry was urging, with all his might, to attack Syria. UK Prime Minister David Cameron agreed and they were heading for a full out war, maybe even with chemical weapon.

In the eleven hours, so to speak, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov intervened and made Mr Assad to hand over all his stock of chemical weapons to be destroyed which was within a year.

An UN special team went to Syria and investigated.  As of today, the report was never published. It makes you wonder what is going on there. The UN supposed to be neutral and no matter which side dropped the weapon it should have been published.

It has now been revealed that ISIS has chemical to produce weapons and it is assumed about 20 tons of it. They are producing them and it is not known where the chemical came from; or at least so it had been said.

Prime Minister David Cameron started bombing the ISIS in 2014 even so the MPs voted against it. His decision could have wide reaching implication. Especially now that Russia started to get involved and President Vladimir Putin decided to increase military back-up of President Bashar Assad. Libya and Iran are also on his side.

It is hard to accept that America will not stop interfering in other countries and the reason for it; if American stops or slows down their armoury production their economy will go down too.

Since Sept 14, 2014 the US-led-coalition launched air raids. At the same time they are supplying 5,000 ‘moderate rebels’ to fight the IS on the ground of Syria.  There is no such thing as a ‘moderate rebel’. It is another smoke screen.

.

One news might be good in a strange way. el-Qaeda’s leader  Ayman al-Zawahiri decided to attack ISIS because their leader Abu Baker al-Baghdadi claimed to be the leader of all Muslims.  Everybody agrees that ISIS got out of hand.

So far 4million Syrian fled which is one of the largest exodus in modern times and 20,000 dead and it mainly increased since 2013 when the situation deteriorated.

A further 7,6million Syrians have been displaced within Syrian.

A report published by the UN in May 2015 stated an estimated loss in economy was $202billion. Looking at all these figures in human and financial loss emphasizes the madness of war.

The supporting Kurd militia seek to defend three autonomous enclosures in the north of Syria.

Already the last time, after the chemical weapon was dropped, John Kerry kept putting fuel to the fire by shouting about 1,500 people died even so the experts from the doctors who were there at the time said that it was around 500.  UK PM David Cameron also added by stating he was ready to send warships and air supplies. The Russian put their foot on the fuse which was slowly burning towards another World War.  The people, who always suffer most, kept holding their breath.

Now, instead of John Kerry having learnt his lesson keeps pushing it again to an all out confronting. When the Russian appeared on the scene to back-up Assad then John Kerry started to change his tune. He stated that a diplomatic solution is always best. He now will fly to Moscow to a meeting with the Russian government.

The US has about 50 million starving and homeless people but John Kerry managed for Congress to agree to $500million to supply the ‘moderate rebels’.

The UK has over one billion starving and homeless people and three million unemployed but there is hundreds millions available for war.

It is absolute lunacy and every one in the street agrees with the new Labour leader Mr Corbyn when he wants to stop war. Look at Switzerland. A neutral country and a fine example of prosperity; having only a reserve army.

JEREMY CORBYN LABOUR NEW LEADER

He won it by 60 per cent out of 400,000 votes. Mr Corbyn has now the hard task to pick the right people for his Shadow Cabinet Ministers.

His number of promises certainly gave him the majority of votes. His plans are:

As a self-described democratic socialist, Corbyn has advocated the re-nationalisation of public utilities and railways, re-opening coal mines, combating corporate tax evasion and avoidance as an alternative to austerity, abolishing university tuition fees and restoring student grants, an unilateral policy of nuclear disarmament and cancellation of the Trident nuclear weapons programme, quantitative easing to fund infrastructure and renewable energy projects, and reversing cuts to the public sector and welfare made since 2010 by the government of David Cameron. He is also a member of the Socialist Campaign Group, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Amnesty International, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the National Chair of the Stop the War Coalition. (Wikipedia)

n general bringing back equality to the UK. He has certainly all the right boxes ticked and hopefully he achieves them all.

Since Prime Minister David Cameron and his Tory Party riding rough-shots across the general party it certainly needs a man like Jeremy Corbyn to stop them. Already the Tories spreading smears and lies stating that Mr Corbyn plans to axe the.Army. He really said was that he axed the Nuclear weapons and it would be nice if there was no army and peace across the world. The full speech can be read in the Daily Mirror which he gave on 26 October, the anniversary of the Atom Bomb.

Jeremy Corby is a MP at Islington North and was a backbencher all those years from 1983. He is known for giving answers he believes in and not answers to get votes. Sometimes it even went against the Labour Party but there again it was Tony Blair at that time.

Mr Corbyn is known as left-wing but left-wing or right-wing as long it pulls the Labour party back onto the road it was famous for. Tony Blair with blinding the public with “New Labour” almost dismantling the original Labour Party.  It turned out that he was nothing but a Thatcherite. Why he never joined the Tories straight away is a good question?

Now Mr Corbyn seems to face all the problems the Tories created and bring back the Labour to care for the people again. As Mr Corbyn stated in one of his speeches when someone accused him to bring the country back to the 1980 he replied: “No, I bring it back to the 1970s when Harold Wilson and James Callaghan were in power. Harold Wilson was the only Prime Minister who did not follow the US He refused to join in when the US declared war on Vietnam.  He also paid down the National Debts. James Callaghan was praised by The Guardian for the best Prime Minister since Attlee.

The most important fact is now that the Labour MPs are unite behind Mr Corbyn and bring the Party back to its full glory which would win the next election.  MPs, no matter which party, seem to have one ambition to climb the ladder and fill their own pocket; instead to support their leader and work together to bring prosperity to the country and its people. As Mr Corbyn said a few days ago that MPs are hopping in and out of limousines, go to big dinners. In his opinion that is not what MPs suppose to be there for. They should work for the people who voted them in.

Mr Corbyn does not give that impression and maybe it was also a point which brought him the win of Labour Leadership. People have more than their full share of MPs and leaders living in luxuries while demanding austerity. The gap between rich and poor has widened almost to the Victories ages.  The public is on widespread starvation, homelessness, over 1,000 food banks to keep them alive and thousands committed suicide or died of starvation while the millionaires and billionaires doubled and trebled their wealth in the last four years.

With Mr Corbyn it seems like a new dawn and hope has broken because he is known as a hard man when he wants to achieve his plans, speaks his minds and believes in it. He also plans to give other Labour MPs a chance to speak at Prime Minister’s Question Time in the House of Commons.  If the Labour MPs have the sense to unite behind him Labour not only brings back the Britain which it was famous for but also the original Labour Party.

Daily Mirror

FEAR LOSING NHS BRITISH IDENTITY WITH TTIP -- Updated 27 Oct., 2019

AMERICANS ARE KNOWN 
FOR BEINGSTEEL-HARD 
AND COLD-HEARTED 
SALESMEN.  YET DODGY 
DAVE CAMERON 
 FOLLOWS THEM AS LONG 
AS HE GETS HIS REWARD. 
 JUST LIKE TONY BLAIR
 ANOTHER CHARACTERLESS 
CREATURE.  

THE ONLY ONE WHO SAID "NO"
 TO THE USA WAS LABOUR 
PM HAROLD WILSON AVOIDING 
A TERRIBLE  INVOLVEMENT 
IN THE VIETNAM WAR



New fear has risen because the great PM 
David Cameron held a secret meeting
  Thursday, 18^th December, 2014 in Brussels 
with bosses of international corporations 
from private health industry. The very 
secrecy of a summit with people 
from private health industry tells us 
everything despite of Downing Street
denial again that is would not affect 
the NHS but admitted it is a mega-deal.

Update 27 Oct., 2019 -
The thread of an TTIP is still there; PM Johnson and Trump are still eager to sign TTIP
Johnson stated  NHS is off the table but he changed his mind too many times to be trusted. Trump is determined to sign TTIP and  NHS.

Update 23 Jan., 2017 -
President Donald Trump torn up the TTIP

UPDATE: 30 MAY, 2015 --  A vote was taken behind closed doors of which the public will not get information, yet it is the most life changing decision for the people if they decide to agree on the TTIP  

UPDATE:  1  March, 2015  --  Accordingly to a report the NHS had not been taken out of the TTIP. Therefore, if the TTIP will be signed the NHS will be irreversibly private. 

The acceptance of TTIP will not even put to the vote of the MPs least to the public yet it will be a complete sell out of sovereignty and NHS and Welfare State.

That is total dictatorship. The same people wants to introduce democracy in other countries.  They are nothing but hypocritical. 

The very fact that this summit with people connected to private health industry, is held behind closed door in other words we will not be told anything, Downing Street denying frantically it will affect the NHS and yet admit it is a mega deal, tells everything.

Even a top Tory admitted that the NHS will be at the mercy of predatory US healthcare firms.  Trade Minister Lord Livingston openly stated that it will not be necessary to exempt the NHS from the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement which again tells everything. David Cameron will not rest until the NHS is destroyed and he and his friends will have another ‘great deal’ made out of the sell-out.

Labour MP Graham Morris, who sits on the Commons health committee warned: “This is a sinister trade deal. If it goes through without any changes, it will make the privatisation of services like the NHS irreversible.”

Even Margaret Thatcher did not dare to destroy the Royal Mail, gagged the Press and now the NHS but David Cameron is going a step further and put the last nail into the coffin of the once great and proud country of Britain.

The Government stated that the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partneship (TTIP) agreement will be worth £100billion to the EU and £80billion to the US.  They did not mention how much it would be to them or Britain. However, the TTIP has too many dangerous clauses in it and once signed binding forever.  Britain and the EU would be a colony of America. That was the real reason, all the time, about getting the United Europe, military and financially wise, nothing whatsoever about the benefit for the people.

The very clause that companies could sue Britain if any Government decides to nationalise an industry again.  This is pure dictatorship.

Lord Livingston grandiosely announced that there is no need to exclude the NHS because it will not be impacted. Who is he kidding?  Of course, he will be all right with his big income and private insurance and so is the rest of the Elite.  It is the average person who will not be able to afford the private insurance and therefore not be treated just like in America. Once the private insurances get the green light the contribution will be shooting up like anything and the shares in the pockets of the Elite will increase and bring multiple dividends. This is the real reason behind the sell-off of the NHS.  We have to ask again: “Who is he kidding?”

All this wheeling and dealing which is nothing but Tory’s way behind closed door is against democracy.  As Unite union chief Len McCluskey blasted: “The people of this country didn't vote for selling off our NHS and they did not vote to make the sell-off irreversible by giving US companies the right to sue us in secret courts.”

IT IS NOTHING BUT PURE DICTATORSHIP.

Daily Mirror