REMEMBER there was a glimpse of hope to stop fighting in Syria. We dont hear anything any more about it
UPDATE 17 January, 2016: So far there seems no sign of it. The British Government announced that they flew bombing raids last Sunday.
Why is it not upheld?
It supposed to start early January? Why is Mr Cameron ignoring it and bring more danger to this country? It is the man in the street who will pay the price. Mr Cameron does not seems to care.
Why is it not upheld?
It supposed to start early January? Why is Mr Cameron ignoring it and bring more danger to this country? It is the man in the street who will pay the price. Mr Cameron does not seems to care.
UN Security
Council voted unanimously for a cease fire in Syria. It is the best news there
could have been.
US Secretary
of State John Kerry said: “An UN plan for Syria is a “milestone” in the effect
to end the conflict there.”
Although agreeing with the statement but it is a
contradiction to Mr Kerry previous statements and especial to his previous
action.
John Kerry
added: “Mr Assad had lost the ability to unite the country and demands Mr Assad
immediate departure which would prolong the war.”
The West and
Arab nations concluded the resolution that Mr Assad could be part of the
transition but insist he must be gone at the end of it
Let us hold
here and get a few facts in. The US started to supply arms and support
Al-Qaeda, four year ago. Slowly one by one other western country joined in. From Al-Qaeda sprang ISIS which grew and now
so powerful that the West and Russia see no alternative but to destroy them.
All the time the West were supplying them with weapons through the back door and
fighting in the front.
Double
dealing never worked out in the long run and it has not in this case.
It was
planned that 34 countries, including the UK, establish an army and is under the
command of Saudi Arabia to defeat ISIS. Whether Russia and China is part of it is not
clear. It is also not clear whether that plan provoked the UN to call for a Security
Council meeting because if the West and Arab countries join the army they
would be up against Russia and Chine.
Russia and China support Mr Assad.
This
situation could develop into another World War very quickly because there are too many countries involved again Russia and China.
Coming back
to the UN Security Council resolution it was also decided Syria would have,
that they called, a “democratic” election.
US have hardly a democratic action when they keep attacking other
country with no other reason but dominate them but they keep waving the flag
about democracy.
As Syrian UN
ambassador Bashar Jaafan already pointed out: “There is a glaring contradiction
between outside countries talking about letting Syria decide their future yet
also insisting on replacing Mr Assad.”
UN Security
Council Resolution No 2254
n Calls for ceasefire and formal talks or a
political transition to start in early January.
n Groups seen as “terrorists” included IS and
al-Nusra Front, are excluded.
n “Offensive and defensive actions” against
such groups – a reference to air strikes by US –led coalition and Russia – to continue.
n UN chief Ban Ki-Moon to report by 18 January,
2016, on how to monitored ceasefire.
n “Credible, inclusive and non-sectarian
government” to be established within six months.
n Political transition should be Syria-led.
Russia
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: “It would be possible to reach an
agreement on a unity government for Syria within six month.
The resolution
will not effect the bombing by Russia, France and US against IS,
So far 250,000 people had been killed
in the civil war and millions displaced.
However,
there is a disagreement already which armed group should be labelled as
terrorists and therefore to be bombed.
As wonderful
the news of a cease file sounds on the surface but if you read in between the
lines there is still the insistence to remove Mr Assad which was the reason of
starting the civil war supported by the West.
Therefore
the resolution does not look as solid as it is made out to be but it is a great step forward and hopefully it holds and continues to bring everlasting peace.
Apart from
destroying the IS; the US and West should keep out of Syria’s affairs.
US, UK and
the West should learn from the recent wars which did not solve anything but
caused more troubles.
In
Afghanistan the so hard fought Helmsman district was freed from Talibans is now
run over again and in Talibans’ hands. How must those solders feel like about
the sacrifices of their killed and maimed comrades, some for life?
In Iraq
there was no IS until the war was fought there and now it is a training ground
for them. From there they lS spread into Syria.
Therefore America should stop to be so
self righteous and play the policeman of the world. So far they ruined Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran,
Lebanon, Libya and Syria under the great cover “democracy” but in reality
keeping their weapon industry going.
No comments:
Post a Comment