SUMMARY IT IS ABSOLUTE INCREDIBLE BUT SO FAR ONLY ONE WAS FOUND GUILTY. TWO OTHER ARE STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.
Today the
Crown Prosecution Service stated: “insufficient evidence”.
Let's face facts, to bring it into court the police must have established facts and sufficient evidence . Whom are you trying to kid CPS?
Police is not so incompetent to bring cases without enough evidence because they do not want to end up like in this case but you make them look silly. How must they feel after all the hard work they put in. It must have been very hard to find evidence in a politician's book and being able to produce it.
Let's face facts, to bring it into court the police must have established facts and sufficient evidence . Whom are you trying to kid CPS?
Police is not so incompetent to bring cases without enough evidence because they do not want to end up like in this case but you make them look silly. How must they feel after all the hard work they put in. It must have been very hard to find evidence in a politician's book and being able to produce it.
29 cases
had been brought to the attention of the police. At the GE2015 campaign the
allegation of not all expenses had been declared and that the “volunteers” were
campaigning for the local MP. It was revealed that they did campaign for the Tory MP
to win the election and therefore expenses should have been declared which
would have brought the total sum passed the allowed total amount. These are the
grievances for the police getting involved and handed the 29 cases to the CPS.
Nick Vamos,
head of the CPS, announced today: “Under the Representation of the People Act, every
candidate and agent must sign a declaration on the expenses return that, to the
best of their knowledge and belief, it is a complete and correct return as required
by law.
“It is an
offence to knowingly make false declaration. In order to bring a charge, it must
be proved that a suspect knew the return was inaccurate and acted dishonestly
in signing the declaration. (That is a good one as if they would admitted it)
“Although
there is evidence to suggest the returns may have been inaccurate, there is
insufficient evidence to prove the criminal standard that any candidate or
agent was dishonest.”
Isn’t it a
contradiction in itself?
He added further:
“The Act also makes it a technical offence for an election agent to fail to
deliver a true return. By omitting any “Battle Bus” costs, the return may have
been inaccurate.”
Tory Party
chairman Patrick McLoughlin pointed out that they are pleased with the verdict
and they believe it was a case of politically motivated and unfounded complains
which wasted police time.
Of course, it was,
how else would a true Tory think?
In my
opinion, I can’t see the police would waste time on 29 cases if there were not
some evidence in the first place.
Another miracle!
Another miracle!
One couple
came on the BBC stated that they did not campaign for the local MP but for the
Tories therefore their expenses should have been declared. They were put up in
hotels and travels were all paid for. They admitted that they could not stay
quiet and had to speak the truth. After that they resigned from the Conservative
(Tory) Party and joined Labour.
Another white-wash!
It would have been a surprise to the people if they were convicted of fraud.
There goes “strong and stable” Tory Party. At least May dropped “Equal Society”
which was just as unfounded as “strong and stable” and “give me a strong hand to
deal with Brexit”.
All her
slogan ring so hollow you can hear the wind whistle through. Not one solid
promise for NHS, schools and Welfare funding although they are hard to belief
them any more after all the broken promises from GE2010 and 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment