European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker admits: " We are no longer respected in our countries when we emphasise the need to give priority to the EU."
Matthew Elliot, chief executive of the Vote Leave group, said: "Even the Eurocrats admit the EU isn't working for Europe.
"Juncker should have added that Brussels costs too much - £350million a week for British taxpayers.
"On June 23 we can kick out the unpopular and hapless EU President and instead spend our money on our priorities."
================================================
PLEASE BE SO KKIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
=========================================================================
Tory MP Craig Mackinlay said: "Jean-Claude Juncker is right that the EU is unpopular and too interfering, it lost respect.
"He also forgets to mention that it costs too much - not least due to his £250,000-a-year salary - and is incapable of dealing with global challenges such as the migration crisis.
"That is why it would be safer to say goodbye to Euro fat cats like Jean-Claude and his meddling EU judges."
Mr Juncker adds further at a meeting of the Council of Europe: "The European projects had lost parts of its attractiveness. One of the reason EU citizen are stepping away from the Europe projects is the fact that we are interfering in too many domains of their private lives.
"We were wrong to over-regulate and interfere too much in the lives of our citizens.
"Voters were repelled by the thread of expanding Brussels powers.
"Its true we are not very popular when advocate for Europe."
At the same time Mr Juncker refused to answer a question from Tory Kelly Tolhurst about what the EU were doing to cut costs.
This fact already proves that the glorious sounding words were nothing but words.
Of course, Mr Cameron hooked in straight away and turned it to his advantage with points which were not there if you read it probably and in between the lines.
David Cameron spokeswoman said: "What you have seen the President pointing out is the need for the European Union to focus on areas where it can add value and not over-interfere. That is something we have been calling for for a while."
The truth is that if Mr Juncker meant what he said Mr Cameron would not have had such a hard job to get the changes he wanted. Even those almost unimportant points were watered down and soon, after his return, it was announced that it can be torn up any time. It is not legal because it was not registered in Strasbourg at the court.
Therefore do not be blindfolded by his sudden admission of over-interference. When Mr Junker should have interfered to ease or solve the migrants crisis he sat back and never lifted a finger but he asked for Britain to pay £500million to give the Turks a £4,2billion.
Already Brussels promised a tsunami of new regulations if UK stays in the EU. It proves the thick nerve and brazenness of Brussels.
EU needs the UK for its £19billion membership fee and various others contributions like the recent £500million. It has also a high import of goods to the UK. The opting out of the EU could also have a domino effect on the rest of the countries.
It is the only reason for the honeyed words from Mr Juncker and it will be a difference when the UK votes "Yes". If these words were true Mr Junker and his MEPs would not have over-interfered in the first place. Surely they are that intelligent enough to realise it would backfire but they ploughed on.
The years people were complaining about the fishing quotas and other ships fishing in British waters because of the restrictions but Brussels never eased the rules.
The situation with ECHR overruling British Law constantly and not because it made more sense on the contrary it made less.
By now Brussels rules the UK so much so do not buy Mr Juncker's words. He just wants to swing it into a "yes" vote in the eleventh hours.
No comments:
Post a Comment