THATCHER PLAN TO DEMOLISH WELFARE STATE

Well her wish will come true now !!!!   Tories out !!!!!

PM May "Equal Society" will finalize Thatcher's will.

What a disgusting woman!!!!

Thatcher's policies are followed on in today's Tory Government which is even more disgusting

Ever so often files are released which were under the Official Secret Act. On Friday, amongst the papers, a file was revealed that Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher planned secretly to axe the welfare state.

This revelation must have been the biggest shock to the nation.

Amongst the proposal, drawn up by Whitehall the Central Policy Review Staff, was scrapping free NHS, although it is not free because People pay National Insurance, charging for education and ending the annual increase of benefits in line with inflation and cutting defence.

Chancellor Sir Geoffrey Howe commissioned the report and proposed the plan at a specially convened meeting of the Cabinet on 9 September, 1982.

Apparently, it even caused an uproar amongst her faithfuls. Nigel Lawson, Energy Secretary, recalled in his memoires "it was the nearest thing to a Cabinet riot."

It was leaked to The Economic and it started a public outcry.

At the following Conservative party conference in Brighton Margaret Thatcher was forced to declare "NHS is safe in our hands."This very phrase was also used by her glove puppet David Cameron time and again.

 Apparently, every time he used it; he demolished the NHS more by withdrawing fund for a number of his newly funded  'flagship' schemes which never came to anything. All meant to weaken financially the NHS. He also introduce hundreds of contracts to infiltrate the NHS. Contractors, as it is well known, have only one thing in mind - profit for themselves and the shareholders.

Well, Thatcher's boy Cameron started to make her dreams become reality because it also was revealed that she never gave up on the idea, despite great opposition.

It also shows us how much the principles of the Tory's Cabinet deteriorated. As stated it nearly caused a riot but today Cameron's and May's Cabinet just agree with the dismantling of the Welfare State without a whisper of disagreement.

Since David Cameron started the waggon rolling of dismantling the NHS and Welfare and in an increasingly, frightening speed the present PM May is now determined to put the last nail into the coffin.

Richard Branson, known for his  badly run railway service, was allowed to buy 200 contracts in the NHS.

In 2010 when David Cameron, leader of the Tory Party, campaigned for the General Election he too promised "NHS is safe in our hands."

The moment he won the election, he sacked 5,000 nurses and doctors and they were replaced with agency staff which cost three times as much.  A plan to weaken the finance of the already hard-up NHS even further. Another dirty trick.

He also promised to invest £8bn into the NHS and won the election but obviously it was not done. He introduced austerity, closed numerous libraries, local Post Office in rural areas where people really depend on; children's nurseries even his mother openly repelled against it; sold the Royal Mail a 500 year old institution; axed 5,000 police at the time of  crime at its highest; axed Army, RAF, Navy personal by the thousands and still increased the National Debts by over £600bn.

By now the National Debt stands near £2trillion and with all the Tories savings. What is really going on? It is incredible and impossible.

CORBYN HAS TO FACE A CONTEST Update 19 July, 2016

UPDATE: 19 July, 2016 --
In my opinion I have never seen a politician treated like that and only because he has principles, respect and is all for the people. Of course, it does rattle Tories who most of them have none of it. The worst,  Cameron, Osborne, etc have gone but I doubt their influence.

Mr Corbyn has to face on Monday night a deadline set by the rebels for contest. They still do not seem to give up on getting Mr Corbyn out.

Angela Eagle, who seems one of the most determined ones, stated that she has 50 nominations which is required to demand a contest.

Mr Corby said: "Those who want to challenge my leadership are free to do so in a democratic contest, in which I will be a candidate." He also told the rebels that he will fight for his leadership which had a majority of 57 per cent. Ever since Mr Corbyn was elected 100,000 new members joined the Labour Party.

Surely this should be proof enough that the people want Mr Corbyn and he has the right politics. Why are these rebels causing troubles and preventing the Labour Party to close ranks to fight an election which could be as soon as the autumn. Labour would have a good chance to win it. Or is there more than meets the eye; through the back door? Then they should do the decent and honourable thing and change over.

They should not be there and trying to break up the Labour Movement. A Party which is all for the people not like the Tories which are all for themselves and brought and will bring down further the country.

Mr Owen Smith, former shadow work and pensions secretary who resigned, has enough supporters to run but prefers further delay to achieve a peaceful agreement.

Mr Watson, deputy leader, will give a presentation on Monday evening at the Parliamentary Labour Party meeting. He too tried to avoid a contest.  Some Labour Party members asked for endorsement of Ms Eagle or Mr Smith as a single "unity candidate to take on Mr Corbyn.

A vote of no confidence and mass resignation did make Mr Corbyn to resign. It is incredible that the people he chosen to built his Shadow Cabinet turned on him. He chosen them because he had the most trust in them. So why did they turn on him? How must Mr Corbyn feel? He must be very hurt.

On top of it all David Cameron humiliates him every time at PMQ and it does not proof to be very clever. Everyone can do this, even four year kids do it at Kindergartens. Yet he struts about and airs himself in his glory when his lot cheer him and laugh.

My suspicion is that either he or his great pal Tony Blair are behind it trying to break up the Labour Party and at present with Mr Corbyn fear them most. After all the Tories are split since the EU referendum. It is always the method of the Tories whenever they have inside trouble they push the attention onto Labour.

A new idea emerged yesterday. The backers of Mr Corbyn wants to use the Chilcot report to attack his critics. A draft motion calling on MPs who voted for the Iraq war which includes Ms Eagle to apologise, has been distributed by left-wingers.

Mr Corbyn wrote in the Guardian "MPs also need to respect the democracy of our party and the views of Labour's membership , which has increased by more then 100,000 to over half a million in the past fortnight alone - by far the largest it has ever been in modern times. Our priority must now be to mobilise this astonishing new force in politics." 

Evening Standard

 

PM MAY FOLLOWS CUNNING CAMERON - Updated 28 Sept, 2016

Updated 28 Sept., 2016 -- Mr Cameron resigned and left Parliament. The new PM Theresa May is now planning to move the borders of the constituencies. Needless to say for the Tories advantages.

There is a great number of Labour constituencies planned to be wiped off.  Talking about democracy! 

UPDATE: 1 March, 2016
Mr Cameron also decided to nominate 40 Tories and donors for the House of Lords. It will strengthen the Tory voting power in the House of Lords and his bills will not be so easily defeated there.

Since the 30 Tory MPs revolted and his mother and her sister were criticising the Prime Minster's fund but cunning Cameron found a new way to smooth the waves.

He released a £300million fund to ease the funding cuts to local governments which go to the Tory run councils.

The only counter attack is to use your vote on 5 May, 2016 Council Election and vote LABOUR as much as possible. There has to be a full stop and a way out. 

The following list shows clearly the cunning of Mr Cameron is buying the Tory’s MPs who threatened to block local government cuts. It is the most important job of this Prime Minister to keep his little flog under his control no matter what it costs because he knows that as long he has their votes he stays in control and being PM

This Wednesday the House of Commons 30 Conservative MPs were prepared to vote against the local government finance settlement.  Would the same result be if the Labour MPs threatened it with it?

Labour analysis shows 83 per cent of the new £300milion two years funding will go to Tory councils.

Surrey ----- £24million

Hampshire -£19million

Hertfordshire - £16million

Essex ------- £14million

West Sussex - £12million

Kent ------ £11million

Buckinghamshire - £9million

Oxfordshire - £9million - Mr Cameron’s own constituency.

The funding cuts have been criticised by the PM’s mother and her sister who stated that it is a “great, great error” to allow 44 children’s centres to close in Oxfordshire. Clare Curries, aunt of the PM, said on ITV News: “That her nephew is a family man who she believes doesn’t want them to be shut down”.

Now there is a newsflash. What about the one million families relying on food banks for years now, to feed their children and parents skip breakfast to give it to them? The situation is so desperate that teachers buying the children breakfast and/or lunch. Never mind about children’s centres being closed.

Where was the family man when receiving letters for years, even from religious leaders, about the poverty, starvation and homelessness in the country and he denied it?

Where was the family man when Disabled Benefit was cut or even withdrawn?  The Independent Living Funds for the most disabled people transferred to the cash strapped councils  which face more cuts knowing very well the council will not be able to cope.

Labour councils have been cut already to the bare bones since 2010. There is no extra funding to avoid closing children’s centres, libraries and elderly care facilities coming from David Cameron mother or her sister. The councils already lost 30 per cent in funding since 2010 and now face a massive 56 per cent over the next five years.

Mr Cameron’s mother and her sister were only criticising him for the Oxfordshire council losing their funding. Typical of that class they were not fighting for the rest of the country which appeared to be the case at first.

It will end like during Thatcher’s time when the country came to a standstill.

Steve Reed, Labour Local Government minister, said: “Cameron has engaged in a blatant misuse of public money in a shameless attempt to buy votes and buy off Tory MPs.”

He added: “The government is covering up where the money has come from and won’t explain why almost all of it is being handed to Tory council’s just weeks before council elections across the country. Councils in poorer areas have suffered much harder cuts since 2010 but they are getting next to nothing.  The Tories have picked millions of pounds from taxpayers’ pockets to buy off their own MPs who faced with a rebellion in the run up to local election.”

The most deprived councils are Middlesbrough, Knowsley, Hull, Liverpool and Manchester and received nothing.

The least deprived are Hart, Wokingham, Chiltern, Waverley, and Elmbridge which received together £5.3million.

Gary Porter, chairman of the Local Government Association, who was made a peer by Cameron last year, said it will go towards easing the financial pressure of local authorities who were affected by the reduction of allocating funding and will ensure that no council will move into a negative grant funding position within the next three years.”

What is that poor guy talking about?

The Rural Service Network includes 150 councils said: “That it was pleased that the government had chosen to smooth the impact of the cuts, the move wouldn’t change the overall position over the next four years.”

Another load of rubbish to put it politely. Do they convince themselves or are they trying to convince the public? Do they really think people are that gullible or could not care less about it?

The Guardian

MARY CAMERON VS DAVID CAMERON - Update 12 March, 2016

UPDATE: 12 March, 2016 - 
24 Children's homes had been closed in Oxfordshire. Also the ones Mrs Cameron mentioned in her petition. Apparently she worked in them as a volunteer. Could she not saved them by financing them privately? However, Oxfordshire is a rich area and surely people are not relying on children's centres as such but where it really hurts is where women have to go out to work and they lose that support.

Wow what a surprise and good news. Mary Cameron the mother of David Cameron signed a petition to stop closure of a children home in Oxfordshire. She also spoke out against the devastating cuts of her son and his Tory Party. Hopeful, Mary Cameron can turn it around before the devastating effect comes down on the poor and disabled after April.

It is also hoped that she will not only achieve it just for the Oxfordshire area which is solid Tory county.

Will it reach her son’s abominable doing and his disciples?  

It would even be so bad if it would decrease the debts of the country but after six years of austerity it has increased by over £600billion. So what is going on in the Chancellor George Osborne’s books? Plus they sold and privatised numerous state owned companies. The councils had already a 30 per cent cut of their services during the previous five years Tory and LibDem Coalition reign. They cut down the Army, police, teachers, nurses and doctors.

The nation will thank Mary Cameron from all their hearts for standing up for them.  She seems to have more sense, care and heart than her son.

Mr Cameron seems to have gone worse ever since he doubtfully win after five devastating years in the May 2015 General Election with his dictatorial, devious, selfish, illusory, unfulfilled promises of politics.

Mary Cameron seems to be as kind hearted and caring as Elizabeth Murdoch who was the mother of Rupert Murdoch. Elizabeth Murdoch lived in Australia and worked hard all her life, despite of being a millionaire, for charities till her dying days. Well, we all know what Rupert Murdoch is like definitely nothing for her to be proud of.

Daily Mirror

REVOLT BY SENIOR TORY MINISTERS Update 14 Nov., 2016

NEW PM THERESA MAY

So stop crowing about Labour's split continuously.  
Tories are splitting as well.
It is getting childish!!!

Update 15 Nov., 2016 --
Press and Government does not need to point the finger at Labour being split. Conservative Party is split just the same.

News emerged that a group of MPs which have been sacked and backbencher when Mrs May became Prime Minister. They threaten her now and demand to get  back into Government again. Their ultimatum is July 2017. Would their names be George Osborne, Ian Duncan Smith, Michael Gove or even David Cameron?

They bought the country down to the highest deficit for 67 years; reduced the credit rating to sixth; increased debts by 700billion despite austerity; created the biggest number of super rich; brought the public down to rely on food banks and demand, demand to be brought back into the Cabinet.


Senior Tories demanded to be allowed to campaign for an “EU Exit”. They lost face in Mr Cameron spending days travelling round European cities to get agreements for negotiations of UK’s membership.

 

Mr Cameron’s main point is cutting down on immigrations which is the main point for a United Europe and unlikely to be changed for Britain. Mr Cameron had tried last year and was turned down flat from which he should have learned a lesson.

Instead of waiting till Mr Cameron reveals the results of his negotiation the senior Tory ministers putting on pressure to suspend “collective responsibilities” and let them run their own campaign to exit the EU.

The former Defence Secretary Liam Fox, Department of Work and Pensions Ian Duncan Smith, Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers and Commons Leader Chris Graylings threaten with resigning if Mr Cameron will not agree with them to have their own campaign regarding “BREXIT”.

Last week Home Secretary Theresa May and Justice Secretary Michael Gove refused to rule out campaigning to leave.

Tory MP Steve Baker, head of the Conservatives for Britain and Brussels group, said: “ It is inevitable that some members of the Cabinet will feel they have to resign if they are browbeaten into supporting a deal this flimsy.”

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU.

==================================================

Former Prime Minister John Major said: “It would be extraordinary if anybody decided to campaign against Cabinet policy. People deserve to hear a clear-cut argument, not an internecine piece of party strife.”

Boris Johnson, a would be party leader, said: “To have infuriated rivals, who believe his anti-EU statements are just for show, by urging Mr Cameron to be more robust in his EU negotiations.”

This is quite surprising news but not surprising that even top Tory ministers are having enough of Brussels heavily interference.  Ever since EU established the policy of an open border the better off countries are having too high immigrations from poorer countries which cannot be coped with.

Furthermore, the British Law is to be decided by EU. Businesses are so red-taped that it is hindering them to export even if the demand is there. Fishing industry which was one of Britain's top employments has been ruined by EU’s quotas.  The still operating fishermen have to throw overboard  fish if it is over the quota which does not improve the fish stock and is a total waste

Mr Cameron trying to negotiate on immigration and British Law but had seen, so far, 10 leaders and none of them agreed to back him. It is understandable in some way because if they change the rules for one country they all come with some other complains wanting to have it changed. Beside Mr Cameron has to have the agreement from the 27 countries unanimously to have it change which is impossible. After that the European Parliament has to look into it and agree.

In other words, Brussels made sure their rules are impossible to change.

Surely, his Cabinet Ministers and 92 Advisers could have told him that or is he so stubborn not taking any notice of it? More likely it was just an exercise to hoodwink the public or trying to.

.

ESTATE CHEQUERS FOR PRIME MINISTERS RELAXATIONS

NEW PM MAY IS NOW RESIDING THERE

TO RELAX FROM HER HARD WORK

CUTTING WELFARE, NHS AND SELLING

BRITISH COMPANY TO FOREIGN BIDDERS

CHEQUERS

The country estate Chequer was given to the nation in 1917 for Prime Ministers to relax.  It belonged to Lord and Lady Lee of Farnham. It is a very luxurious pile with tennis courts, swimming pools, stables and all the luxury you can think of. It is run by Chequer Trust. The estate measures about 1,000 acres.

The costs has risen from £390,000 when Tony Blair was there to £717,000 a year under David Cameron.  

No austerity there!  On the Contrary!!!!   Pointing at Labour???

Altogether since 2010 when Camerons took up residence at Chequers the taxpayers had to face a bill of £3.6million.  But telling the public they have to tighten their belts.

They were rave parties and Ibiza party for his wife’s birthday. Entertainment for celebrities and Tory’s donors.

ONE OF CHEQUERS RAVE PARTIES
                                   Mr and Mrs Cameron                                      

The millionaire David Cameron also claims £32,000 a year expenses for his mortgage of a luxurious home in West London while he rents it out and lives at Downing Street for free.

Low-paid families who the Prime Minister praises so often as hard-working will receive a letter from HM Revenue and Customs just before Christmas telling them that their tax credit will be cut or axed completely from April 2016.

At the same time the Tories are proud and full of self-importance announcing the living wage, if they get it, which is completely useless since they lost the tax credit.

Labour MP Frank Field, who chair’s the Pension and Work committee, warned the chance the coming tax cuts will be £the single biggest eve cut to tax credit” and cost 3,2 million households £1,350 a year.  It works out to £30 per week while the living wafe will be an increase of £20 per week the most.

UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis said: “While his government is dishing out austerity and misery Mr Cameron is enjoying himself and entertaining on the public purse.”

AT CHEQUERS   --  WIMBLEDON  CHAMPION

UN SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON SYRIA BUT NO Mr.CAMERON

UN ASSEMBLY 

Prime Minister David Cameron flew on Sunday to New York but not to attend the UN general assembly. He will only briefly be there and sent his Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond instead. Instead David Cameron attends the successors of the Millennium Development Goals in New York. Apparently it seems more important to him than trying to solve the crisis of Syria and refugees.

It was one of the most important meetings especially with  crises of Syria and refugees but Prime Minister David Cameron could not make the effort. Now, when the Russians moved in to back-up Assad's regime Mr Cameron is shooting his mouth off and criticises the Russian. Why was he not there when Putin was at the UN?

It is also the 70 anniversary of the UN but the main point of on the agenda is Syria. All the world top leaders including President Obama, Putin, Xi Jinpin and Rouhani will be there to find a way to establish peace, yet it seems that is not important to PM David Cameron to take this great opportunity to find a way to stop the civil war in Syria and the refugee crisis.

David Cameron announced in a interview with the BBC that he is now willing to agree for President Bashar el-Assad to stay for a short period but is still determined to topple the Assad's regime soon. This statement is past the limit of arrogance and power madness.  He keeps calling Mr Assad a dictator who murdered his people and therefore he has to go.

Have we not heard this before in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya?

It is very hard or even impossible for us to know the truth amongst all the propaganda.

Labour foreign secretary Hilary Benn and Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn called for the UN to establish safe havens protected by military force in Syria. It would certainly help the Syrian people who were displaced.

Mr Benn said: “I am telling the prime minister today that that’s just not good enough. Given the scale of the crisis in Syria the prime minister should be staying on and straining every sinew to secure a comprehensive UN Security Council resolution under the chapter VII of the UN charter.” (It allows for military force to “maintain or restore international peace and security.”)

Mr Benn will state at the Labour Party Conference that Britain should pursue an all including political plan for Syria, including Iran and Russia. Mr Benn will say: “There’s been a lot of talk about airstrikes but to bring peace, stability and security to Syria will need a much broader, more comprehensive plan than just trying to deal with (ISIS). This will require political, diplomatic and humanitarian will too

Guardian

UK PM DAVID CAMERON BLAMED LABOUR FOR CREDIT CRUNCH Update 19 April, 2016

DAVID CAMERON IN 
CORNWALL 
SURFING
WARNINGS:  WHALES AND 
SHARKS 
HAD BEEN
         SIGHTED IN CORNWALL

UPDATED:
Who is Mr Cameron blaming now for the highest deficit for 67 years and an increased debts of over £116billion in 2014/15?

Nothing said about that!!!!

Although the “Credit Crunch” was global and started in American David Cameron still blamed Labour for years. It was ridiculous and especially as a top politician should have known better than to put a statement out like that.

On the 16 October 2013 Cameron stated in the House of Commons: “The last Labour Government crashed the economy; they busted the banks; they doubled the national debt; and they bankrupted this country.”

No newspaper disputed his words and David Cameron got away with the lies.

The fact is that the Tory-led Coalition added £500billion to the national debts within five years despite the austerity. No Labour Government ever added more debts in all their years in power as the Tories. There is no official record of busted banks or the country being bankrupt.

Eventually it emerged that it was the top financiers who purposely caused the “Credit Crash” and with that the accusation vanished. No withdrawal or apologise for a false statement

Now we have a Global crash and it started in China affected the rest of the world. Not one word from David Cameron because he is on holiday while the whole FTSE 100 keeps tumbling down.  The Chinese reduced the Interest rate and it rectified the rest of the financial market but the FTSE 100 yesterday.

In 2013 David Cameron prophesised there would be a Global Crash in 2015.  Since Cameron was so clever to forecast the Global Crash would it be wrong to surmise the top financiers had their finger in it again? He advised the voters in the following General Election in 2015 to vote Conservatives to lessen the affect.  They won the election and few days after the downturn of the FTSE 100 started.  At the beginning it was the fault of Greece financial trouble and now China had a terrible crash. Could it be that China became too powerful?  But China has the biggest gold reserve while the US has hardly any.

In 2008 at the time of the “Credit Crash” the GDP went down to minus 2.3 per cent. Gordon Brown the leader of the Labour Government brought it back in 2009 to O.3 percent within a few months. In 2010 when Labour lost the election because political lies and smears; they handed it over with 1 per cent GDP. This gain vanished within three months. In the five years the Tories-led Coalition in power they had two recessions, nearly miss the third one, and were down graded from seven to six positions in the interest rating.

So far there is neither sight nor sound of PM David Cameron while the FTSE100 is spiralling down.  Admittedly the Parliament is on holiday but losing over 1,500 in shares FTSE 100 would surely demand the Prime Minister to return. Besides he has eight Cabinet Minister rebelling against the EU membership.

When Labour leader Clement Attlee came to power in 1945; he inherited huge debts from the Second World War. He introduce social housing, NHS, Welfare, legal aid, nationalised utilities companies and industries, transport infrastructure, education and reduced the debts by 44 per cent through mass program of state investments.

All these welfares Clement Attlee introduced the Tory Government dismantles now and introducing further £12billion Welfare cuts on top of widespread starvation, unemployment and homelessness.

Harold Wilson, Labour Prime Minister, paid down the national debts and did not agree to bring the country into the Vietnam War. He was the first Prime Minister who stood up to the Americans.

Tony Blair, Labour Prime Minister, who turned out to be a Thatcherite did everything what George Bush asked and got the country into an illegal war with Iraq and Afghanistan.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT- Updated 17 Sept., 2015

.

LATEST NEWS:  17 Sept., 2015  --
The Government trying to put through a bill that anyone wanted information have to pay up to £600.  It is a typical sneaking way to cut down Freedom of Information, get some more money and mainly to cover-up.

Well it was to be expected. Too many times PM, Ministers, Chancellor and Depart of Work and Pension Ian Duncan Smith sat there with red faces and if they could not manage that they tried to whitewash it.

.

The last straw was the revelation of the British Pilots bombing Syria. The Prime Minister knew about it since September 2014 and tries now to soften the blow with the excuse they were flying under US operation. As if that would make any difference to the IS if they seeks revenge. 

Does the Prime Minister not think and care about the people who could face bloodshed on the street of the UK?

Apparently he does not.

This Government was also supplying chemicals to the so-called “Freedom Fighters” who were infiltrated by the Al Qaeda and eventually grew the IS. These chemical were to enable them to produce chemical weapons. It came to a head in 2013 when a chemical weapon exploded in Syria.

All the various secret and sly doing were expose by various sources. Now Freedom of Information could be curbed to prevent further information to reach the public.

The Guardian reports:

Mathew Hancock, Cabinet Office Minister, laid a statement before Parliament outlining details about the five-person commission that would be asked to decide whether the act is too expensive and overly intrusive. Members will include Jack Straw, former foreign secretary, who is already on the call for the act to be re-written. Straw is still the subject of FOI requests over the rendition of a terrorist suspect during his time in office.

Lord Carlisle of Berriew will also sit on the committee. He accuses the Government of  “a criminal act” when it published stories using National Security Agency material leaked by Edward Snowdon. The committee’s other members will be Michael Howard and Dame Patricia Hodgson and it will be chaired by Lord  Burns.

The act of Freedom of Information was introduced by the Labour Party which is already a sore spot with the Tories. Furthermore, it was noticed PM David Cameron and his disciples can not face the truth to be given to the public. It is certainly a complete controversy to curb or even complete close the FOI when David Cameron announced, previously, that his Government will be transparent, another broken promise.

Freedom of Information will supply information as long it does not cost more £600 when it concerns a case of the government department and £450 for another public body. In view of this the excuse of costing too much could not be raised but they will.

It also did not make friends, in many corners, to lose the legal battle to stop the publication of Prince Charles’s letters.

Under the Freedom of Information act is an exemption for most internal civil service advice but campaigners fear it will be completely closed down and then kept for 20 years under a blanket ban.

Ministers demanding a reform because they fear exposures pf their internal memos. This Government seems to be nothing but reforming and every time it ends up in a bigger mess.

To me it looks like to keep everything under the table like bombing Syria despite the majority of Ministers voted against it or the revelation made by Edward Snowden.

Information Commissionaire Christopher Graham said: “The act is not without it critics but in providing a largely free and universal right of access to information, subject to legislation exceptional, we belief the freedom of information is fit for purpose.”

CAMERON COULD NOT CHANGE EU RULES NEITHER WILL PM MAY

Prime Minister David Cameron had finally admitted that he could not change the rules of the EU. However, he softens the blow that it might be in the near future.

The main issues were migration, UK border control, European Court of Justice ruling British Law and too many Red Tapes on UK business which he never ever attempt to address. The fact is he could not because these are the very fabric of the EU membership and therefore to continue in the EU does not make sense.

He has now to go into the referendum of Yes/No to the EU membership to be continued or not. Already he started to beat the drums that it would be unwise to leave the EU.

It is wrong to influence the voters because it just suits him and his party.  Even the press are writing reports to that effect.  It seems a repeat of the General Election where the Tories and the Press stated smears and lies about the Labour Party plus many promises and with it the Tories won again. Well, now we see their real face as always after a win in the election.

Personally, a £19billion membership seems too high for what the UK gets out of it, if any. Not to say about the continuous bailing out of other countries.  At the same time Brussels waste money so much so that £95billion are unaccountable and the auditors have not signed their accounts for over 10 years.

There are people starving and freezing in this country they would not is if the money was not wasted by Brussels. Now again the government is determined to cut the Welfare by £12billion, and the social service by £16billion, which will hit these people even more after the benefit being cut to the bone before or completely withdrawn..

What is this government think they are doing? Throwing £19billion to the EU plus several bail outs a year while their own people are so desperate they commit suicide. The austerity was a con because the National debt increased by £500billion and that was not Labour’s fault.

But we are coming back to the EU and Cameron trying to change the treaty.  If he succeeded all the other countries would have turn up with a shopping list. Just from that point of view it is not possible because changes of the EU’s rules would get into complete shamble.

Now David Cameron tries to save his face and quoted the following demands of an “irreversible lock” and “legally binding” guaranteed the EU law will be changed at some point in the future, reported the BBC Nick Robinson.

These are again good sounding words but an empty promise. What does it mean ”to change in the future”? It does mean everything and nothing.

Let’s face facts, the whole operation was bound to fail from a start because, as already stated, if one country gets it allowed other would follow.  It was another dream of David Cameron which was to be foreseen to burst.

Has David Cameron really believed in achieving it or was it another smoke screen?  Who knows?

Since the Tories only won 12 seats more giving them the majority but can easily vanish in the political power struggle; David Cameron asked today the Tories who defected to UKIP to vote for him. Is he starting to panic?

LEVY ON COMPANIES HIRING NON-EU WORKERS

PM  David Cameron
has to laugh about 
it himself  because
corporations pay hardly,
if any, of their taxes
under Tory Government
leave alone this Levy  

This must be a joke? David Cameron copies a pledge from Ed Miliband, Labour’s manifesto.

Government is planning to bring a levy when hiring non-EU workers, funding apprenticeships.

This has to be seen to be believed. Do not forget companies' directors are mostly Conservatives and many and many of them donors.

At the same time he promised, mind you it is another promise, to invest the money into more places of apprenticeships.

Shadow Immigration Minister David Hanson said: “It’s good the Government has finally listened to the calls we’ve made for years to use British skills first. Indeed, when called about for companies employing skilled migrant to take on an apprentice. It’s good to see David Cameron agrees with us.”

Directors of various companies complained about the extra cost. The Institute of Director criticised it as “tax on employing people from abroad.”

Director –General Simon Walker said: “This seems particular odd given how depending the UK’s economy is on international skills and expertise.”

Migrant Advice Council trying to dampen down on non-EU migrants and set up a package which includes the new levy. However, now comes the contradiction. At the same time the government could also raise the number of non-EU nationalities that need to earn, will be given a visa. This politic looks like taking peas out of one pot and put is in another.

David Cameron is desperate to show that he is bringing down the immigration which is a problem at the moment but will this really bring the result?

Katja Hall, department director-general at the CBI, said: “Stopping high skilled workers coming to Britain could damage the economy.  We understand the public’s concern around immigration but limiting highly skilled workers coming to the UK is not the answer. They bring their skill and ideas to this county; pay their taxes and boasting growth.”

UK CHANCELLOR GEORGE OSBORNE PLANS £48BILLION CUT 2014 - Updated 2 July, 2015

UPDATED:  2 July, 2015 --
The emergency budget will be read next Wednesday 8 July, 2015 but bet on it it will not all the truth. 

Already cuts had been announced to the Northern Railways which were promised a £38billion upgrade and turn it into a Northern Powerhouse. 

No cuts to cancellation of the super (white elephant) train HS2. Already at  budget of £50billion and will be finally at £100billion or even more.

Independent Living Allowance which hits the most severely disabled people and their carers.

David Cameron withdrew his promise from the General Election not to cut Tax Credit for low wage earners. Also child credit is most properly being cut. A non-party charity Degree 38 is fighting it with all its might.

David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne are out to get the last penny of the most valnurable and already poor people.
Now they are bakc in power they show their real faces.



UPDATE:  19 March, 2015 -- After all that spin in the Budget the reality will be different as it always was. After every budget the cuts, which they did not mentioned, started.  This budget was designed to catch voters.  Although heavily disguised but it still was obvious.  If voted in, then they show their real face like the last time. It is up to the voters to think hard after five years who to give their vote to.

UPDATE: 7 December,2014 ---  In his Autumn budget he mentioned £27billion but will he stick to it or when they win the next General Election not go back to £48billion  as he mentioned before? The Institute of Fiscal  Study even mentioned he has to cut £55billion. Where do these people think they get it from since everything is already cut to the bare bone is not known?

To crown it all, May had the despicable nerve to authorise it and put it into action on 1 April, 2017; after tens of thousands of people been starving, homelessness, suicides and death from hyperthermia for years.

If all the promises from PM David Cameron fail but the promises from Chancellor George Osborne will not.

According to Mr Osborne the £25billion a year so far is not enough to reach his austerity target. He now supposes £48billion a year, according to the Financial Times. The main areas, it is assumed, are the police, council and defence are the main targets.

So far the government set out a 21 per cent since 2010 and look at the hardship it was introducing to the country and its people. Where on earth will they increase it to 33 per cent? People are already starving surviving only on food banks and if the winter is hard they will die by the thousands because they can not afford to heat their homes.  It is easy to push pencils across accounts books but they have to face the reality and the impact it had already.

===================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU..
===================================================

It is also a fact that with all Mr Osborne’s austerity in the last nearly five years the debts of Britain had increase by £500billion. Would we not like to confront the great Chancellor and hear what he has to say about that? They can not whitewash it with having taken it over from Labour. It is £500billion since 2010. What happen to the books with all the cut backs and trying to save?

It will end like at Margaret Thatcher’s time. There were rows of shops closed at the High Street. Streets not swept and parks neglected.  It still was not as bad as it is at the moment. There were still no food banks for desperate people having to go to. Even the food banks have to cut back the size of parcels because there are too many people to  be helped.. 

All this while this government created 4,700 multi-millionaires and 95 multi-billionaires with an average of £95billions. The gap was never so wide since the Victorian times.

Another report states that since the council had to cut back they cut back on the most vulnerable people, the Old Age Pensioner’s meal-on-wheels. If that is not a crime for one of the richest country in the world, what is?  Yes,  you read right Britain is on the 6^th place still in spite of PM David Cameron and Chancellor George Osborne trying to brainwash the public.

Especially the Old Age Pensioner should be dreaded right. They sacrificed so much for the country of which Cameron and Osborn and their “Elite” have no idea.  All their lives they swam on top of the fat skimmed off the back of hard working people for whom they have no regards.

A government which does not respect their elderly generation is no good. They even cut the £140 Winter Warm payments. But at the same time reduce their fatcats taxes. They literally take the food out of the mouth of old people and give it to the already super rich. It is not only the meal-on-wheels but they are also very lonely and the visit provides them a little break.

In the North East were poverty is most only 25 per cent of councils provide still meals. In the North West it is 48 per cent.   

CAMERON VOWS TO STOP SCOTS MPS VOTING ON ENGLAND

Why did he go to Scotland and fought for them to stay in the UK?

Barely a few days after the referendum won a NO vote to the Independence of Scotland devious Dave vows to strip Scots MPs of Westminster Power.  English nationalism is as dangerous as Scottish nationalism but that is not the reason behind it. The pure reason is to prepare for the next General Election in May 2015. Again Cameron is planning a system to bring it through in high speed by November. If it passes through Parliament then Scotland would not be able to vote on English Laws or vice versa.  This tactic is purely for the advantage of the Tories.

Cameron also plans to set up a committee (mark -- another committee which cost taxpayers’ money) and the head will be William Hague to discuss English question.  What is the House of Commons and Prime Minister Question time for?

===================================================

PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.

===================================================

If Cameron will go through with these ideas it will confront the Scottish people.  He does not seem to realise that the YES vote was very high and only 400,000 more were voting NO.  It is too dangerous to gamble on that loyalty to the United Kingdom in the near or far future.  This point is not in the Prime Minister’s principle and mind.  His only aim is to split the Labour Party with its main loyalty lying in Scotland.

It is also remarkable that UKIP Nigel Farage seems to have slipped out from under the cover of “every man’s Joe” and joins David Cameron in his plan. Is it already a move towards a coalition if the Tories do not win the majority in the next General Election?  Is Farage showing now his real and true colours? After all there are enough Tories “deserters” in his party to jump back again. Was the pretence of an alternative party just to fool people and to gather votes for the moment to back the Tories?  To this writer all the question is a yes.

Labour leader Ed Miliband and even LibDem Nick Clegg admitted that the Parliament is in a shamble.  It is now the moment represented by Cameron for Labour to go all out to win back the doubters and followers of UKIP and Tories whose parties have turned on Scotland.

David Cameron is not planning to turn England for the better such as free prescription which is available in Scotland and Wales just to name one advantage.  He purely does it for the advantage of his Tory Party and tries to establish a Tory kingdom in England where he and his followers can reign forever and turn it back to Victorian times for ordinary people.

The Labour party has 59 seats in Scotland and with them being cut off the win in the next General Election will be certain.  The old saying “Divide and Rule” is at the back of the Tories’ minds and always had been.

If Cameron gets his idea through Parliament it not only alienates the Scottish people but also the rest of the general public. Therefore, the appeal goes already out to use your vote and use it wisely. As you can see the UKIP is not an alternative which people were hoping for and made to believe. Labour at the moment has to get to back to full strength if it wants to win in the next election.  It is not easy with all the laws and regulation applied by the Tories for their own good plus Tony Blair, another hypocrite who turned out to be a Thatcher's boy. Ed Miliband tries hard to bring Labour back to its full power. And he will.

UPDATE:  23 September, 2014

UKIP Nigel Farage goes one step further and is now beating the drum and trying to persuade the Scottish MPs to sign a voluntary agreement not to vote on English laws and legislation till PM David Cameron is able to get it through Parliament and establishes it as law.

Why did Nigel Farage and David Cameron go to Scotland and campaign for a NO vote?  If they wanted to get rid of Scottish MPs' votes, mainly Labour, they could have achieved it that way and saved the taxpayers’ money.

Source Daily Mirror